The Frosting Window/Mirror of Literature
By
Kim Rush
Winston Churchill: Beer is the closest proof that there is a god.
Woman: Sir, you are drunk!
Winston Churchill: Madam, you are uglyand in the morning I will be sober.
Be Drunk
Always be drunk.
That's it!
The great imperative!
In order not to feel
Time's horrid fardel
bruise your shoulders,
grinding you into the earth,
Get drunk and stay that way.
On what?
On wine, poetry, virtue, whatever.
But get drunk.
And if you sometimes happen to wake up
on the porches of a palace,
in the green grass of a ditch,
in the dismal loneliness of your own room,
your drunkenness gone or disappearing,
ask the wind,
the wave,
the star,
the bird,
the clock,
ask everything that flees,
everything that groans
or rolls
or sings,
everything that speaks,
ask what time it is;
and the wind,
the wave,
the star,
the bird,
the clock
will answer you:
"Time to get drunk!
Don't be martyred slaves of Time,
Get drunk!
Stay drunk!
On wine, virtue, poetry, whatever!"
Charles Baudelaire
Imagine, in our world clapped in the
chained strictures of extreme Political Correctness and fabricated Proper
Behavior, this daring poetic metaphorical demand and Churchills comments being
blasted by the 24/7 talking opinion TV newscasters.They would interview each other and tell us
what to think?Baudelaire would be
labeled an unreliable source.Churchill would be damned by their insistence of his removal.His character, however, suggests that he
probably would be appalled by the stupidity of extreme political correctness,
(This is not to challenge the value of respect and importance of ethnic
entities, but to challenge the extreme, plastic, religious, and social absolute
of the superficialness ofat first, a joke, but now an absolute totem of the
twisted evolution of social behavior.) the spinelessness of our leaders, and
would, as a known thinking writer and leader, challenge this social dogma and
defend the human spirit, freedom of thought, and ones ability to formulate a
coherent, ironic response to such social controlanddare I write it, object to
the administrative, all controlling, fascism in the United States?
Yori Lottman posits: Art is the language
of life.What is now our language of
life?Our spirit has been damned by
political correctness blended in religious/political dogma.People labeled as the non-normal have been
turned to pariahs, drugged into automatons of all must be the same.How many past authors whose personality,
physicality, or different reality perception have produced what we now
recognize as great literature?How many
would be, today, on a Doctor prescribed mood altering drug, a psycho-normalcy
drug cocktail, or on the computerized sexual predator list, (I should say here
that this specific behavior is unacceptable and will not be excused,then Poe
should never be read;--he could not live within one block of a school where his
work would be taught, but I wont, because it would disrupt the flow of the
essay.)?How many of these great writers
would be in prisonfor we free United Statesians have the highest per capita
prison population on earthfor they would have fallen victim to the war on
drugs and may have illegally imagined talking rabbits or something more than
available to the enforced normal mind?So our writers will become clean citizens without drugs, politically
correct, religiously right; strictured within a belief of a hodgepodge of
mythology?How dare a future writer go
beyond the brown suited Maoistic demanded normalcy and write what might be
considered drunk in lifes literature?
But they would be bettercured of their
drug use, their abnormal minds, and fit into the good capitalistic world and
pay electric, phone, gas, and rent bills to be normal, productive tax paying
consumers of the modern normalcy, but have no imagination, no true virtue,
(the ancient Greek definition of delving into the core of the human experience)
nor escape the Platonic dark cave and produce no literature?But, if so, what is lost?
Literature is the window/mirror into the
universal value of the human experience.The control of corporate, religious, political, low educational normalcy
is a massive power, smashing the
non-normalthe
propheticvision that literature has presented to expand the view of
humanity.
But Political Correctness has not
suppressed the drive to create before, for the Great Russian writers wrote
masterful works under the absolute Communist politically correct control?They imagined the irony of irony and wrote
above the intellect of their censors and produced literature.Then, why cant the future writers in the
West do the samerise above the controlled norm?
The problem appears in the paradox of
reaching the Universal.This paradox
requires the author to go so deeply personal as a basis for the language art
constructrather than just emotional regurgitation--that his/her personal
experience becomes humanly universal. If an author can only see through the
dark lenses of unacknowledged social control, forced or drugged into normalcy,
so superficialized to be unable to delve into the depths of the psyche, how can
literature be written?It can not.Literature has the possibility of vanishing
in the next hundred years if our culture continues on its absolute,
administrative, politically correct controlled devolution.
The beauty of art as the language
of life will dull into the mere spectacle as hyperbole of the norm.For the spectacle is what is offered along
with the mind numbing political correctness, the religious right, the drugged
to normalcy, the loss of imagination: and the window/marrow of human reality
will frost into the normalcy of consumerism; keep up with the Jones: the
absolute blindness of the black cave of ignorant normalcy. Does no art then
equal no real life?
#
Oh, did you see that kitty litterthe
deodorized kind, is on sale at Wallmart?Read, defend, think, and write away the blandness of promoted
normalcy.Be drunk in the free, open
spirit of literature. Write On!Or,
shall we devolve into H. G. Wells Elori in our time machine?sheep for
consumption?