"In the last election, I wanted to vote for Perot, but I knew he couldn't win, so I voted for Bush instead"" - Anonymous, heard on Public RadioFolk wisdom has it that if you vote for a candidate that has little chance of winning, you are "Wasting your vote" and, therefore, you really should vote for someone who has some chance of winning instead. This interesting bit of wisdom is shared by the "man on the street", the college professor, and the news media persons alike. In this short essay, I will explore the ramifications of this well accepted piece of "logic" and show that the situation is not as simple as supposed and that the proposed stra tegy is sadly misdirected.
But there is another way to look at the importance of your vote and that is from your own personal perspective. Strangely, most people do not take this view -- instead they always view their vote from the vote solicitors view, the group v iew. From your point of view, there is a very disturbing conclusion: your vote will make no impact on the election results!
So, whether you voted for Clinton, Bush, or Perot, your vote had absolutely no impact on the election results. To emphasize this concept, let me suggest the following mental experiment: Let us say that you know that if your preferred cand idate wins you will receive an additional tax relief of $10,000. Unfortunately, on election day, you fell deathly ill from the previous night's partying and was unable to vote. Did your missing the election result in you not getting the $10,000 break? No way!
And if we all vote honestly, new candidates and new parties that must start small, have a chance of becoming established. To vote otherwise is to endanger democracy.